One easy answer is that convenience isn’t as important as typically assumed. Almost everybody who cares sufficient to vote will courageous the inconveniences of in-person voting to achieve this, whether or not that’s as a result of the inconveniences aren’t actually so nice, or as a result of they care sufficient to endure them.
This supposes a sure affordable stage of comfort, after all: Six-hour traces would change the calculation for a lot of voters. And certainly, long lines do affect turnout. It additionally supposes a sure stage of curiosity. Someone would possibly suppose: There’s no means I’m ready a half-hour in line to vote for dogcatcher. Similarly, the significance of a handy voting possibility in all probability grows as the importance of a race decreases.
The implication, although, is that just about each individual will handle to vote if sufficiently handy choices can be found, even when essentially the most most popular possibility doesn’t exist. That makes the Georgia election regulation’s effort to curb lengthy traces probably fairly important. Not solely would possibly it mitigate the already restricted impact of proscribing mail voting, however it would possibly even outweigh it.
Another purpose is that comfort voting might not be as handy for lower-turnout voters, who basically determine total turnout. Low-turnout voters in all probability aren’t excited about how they’ll vote a month forward of the election, after they’ll want to apply for an absentee poll. Someone excited about that is in all probability a high-turnout voter. Low-turnout voters won’t even know till Election Day whom they’ll help. And that makes them much less possible to benefit from advance voting choices like no-excuse early voting, which requires them to take into consideration the election early and typically: to submit an application, fill out a poll and return it.
As a outcome, comfort voting strategies have a tendency to reinforce the socioeconomic biases favoring high-turnout voters. The strategies be certain that each high-interest voter has many alternatives to vote, with out doing fairly as a lot to draw much less engaged voters to the polls.
A remaining purpose is that voting restrictions might backfire by angering and energizing Democratic voters. This regulation’s restrictions on handing out water in line, as an illustration, might do extra to mobilize Democrats than to cease them from voting. One current research even theorized that the Supreme Court’s resolution to roll again parts of the Voting Rights Act didn’t reduce Black turnout as a result of subsequent efforts to prohibit voting have been swiftly countered by efforts to mobilize Black voters.
That doesn’t imply the Georgia regulation or different so-called voter suppression legal guidelines are with out consequence. Many make voting harder, sufficient to intimidate or discourage some voters. Many outright disenfranchise voters, even when solely in small numbers. Perhaps the disenfranchisement of even a single voter deserves outrage and opposition, particularly if the regulation is handed on doubtful and even fabricated grounds, and with Jim Crow mass disenfranchisement as a historic backdrop.