The outcomes might alter the form of the labor motion and one in every of America’s largest personal employers.
Ms. Costa and Ms. Cunningham, who labored as designers at Amazon’s Seattle headquarters, started criticizing the company publicly in 2018. They had been a part of a small group of staff who needed the company to do extra to handle its local weather influence. The group, Amazon Employees for Climate Justice, received more than 8,700 colleagues to help its efforts.
Over time, Ms. Cunningham and Ms. Costa broadened their protests. After Amazon told them that they had violated its exterior communications coverage by talking publicly concerning the business, their group organized 400 employees to additionally converse out, purposely violating the coverage to make some extent.
They additionally started elevating considerations about security in Amazon’s warehouses firstly of the pandemic. Amazon fired Ms. Costa and Ms. Cunningham final April, not lengthy after their group had introduced an inside occasion for warehouse staff to talk to tech staff about their workplace circumstances.
After the ladies had been fired, a number of Democratic senators, together with Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Kamala Harris of California, wrote Amazon expressing their considerations over potential retaliation. And Tim Bray, an web pioneer and a former vice chairman at Amazon’s cloud computing group, resigned in protest.
Mr. Bray mentioned he was happy to listen to of the labor board’s findings and hoped Amazon settled the case. “The policy up to now has been ‘admit nothing, concede nothing,’” he mentioned. “This is their chance to rethink that a little bit.”