He also sent a death scenario to a forensic pathologist, and found that those who responded were more likely to rule it a homicide when the child in the scenario was black and cared for by the mother’s lover when The child was white and cared for. Grandmother.
The authors stated that the study was only a starting point for research and suggested that forensic pathologists further explained how and when relevant information should be used, and should be transparent when using it.
Dr. Four authors of the study, including Carter, were forensic pathologists.
In February, a possible defense witness in Mr. Floyd’s case, Drs. Peterson filed a moral complaint against the four, alleging “conduct for the best interest and purposes” of the profession.
“By basically accusing each member of ‘unconscious’ racism, either charging impossible to prove or refute, members must face this bogus issue whenever testimony is given in court,” he wrote in the complaint Was a copy of which he received in the New York Times.
Dr. Peterson did not respond to a message left with his office, where a spokesman said he was on leave. The ethics complaints are considered confidential, and the accused doctors refused to discuss it or did not respond to a request for comment.
The vitriolic response to the study showed Drs. Surprised Carter.
He said, “I was blown away like this, which is a very strange reaction.” And I’m not sure what it is if everyone has actually read this article. This is an article that states, let’s be aware of this, let’s be active in this, “she said. “I don’t think anyone, any doctor of color, says, ‘Yes, this is news of an earthquake.”